November 8, 2024

Rise To Thrive

Investing guide, latest news & videos!

Newsom’s unusual State of the State speech punctuates a difficult budget

3 min read
Newsom's unusual State of the State speech punctuates a difficult budget

As California grapples with tax revenue shortfalls that threaten his state policy ambitions, Gov. Gavin Newsom delivered an unusual State of the State speech that critics said barely touched on the state’s challenges.

The. Proposition 1 authorized $6.4 billion of bonds to support construction of treatment beds and housing.

The measure, which passed in a 50.2% to 49.8% vote, wasn’t called until 15 days after the election by The Associated Press.

Newsom repeated his claim that no one has done more in recent history at the state level to reduce the number of people living on the streets, adding that his first State of the State speech after taking office in 2019 focused exclusively on reducing the problem.

According to his count, 9,300 encampments have been cleared and 15,300 units of housing have been built, providing shelter to more than 71,000 people. Funding from Proposition 1 will add another 11,000 new beds and housing units, he said.

“We’re requiring counties and cities and the state to focus existing money on housing and treatment for the toughest cases,” Newsom said.

Newsom said the state is approving its first-ever two-year balanced budget in what the governor called a disciplined approach that keeps the state on a strong fiscal footing.

The budget troubles of recent years are showing signs of eroding the state’s bond ratings.

Moody’s Ratings placed the state’s Aa2 rating on negative outlook in May 2023, where the rating and outlook remained after a May 28 commentary.

S&P Ratings revised its outlook on the state to stable from positive in December. It rates California AA-minus. Fitch Ratings affirmed its AA issuer rating and stable outlook for the state in March.

The state’s GOs were most recently in the primary market March 26 with a $2.6 billion deal.

Lead manager JPMorgan was able in final pricing to cut spreads five to 10 basis points from retail sales, pricing to yield from 3.12% for 2025 maturities to 3.89% for 2053.

Moody’s is still weighing whether any of the factors that led to the negative outlook have changed.

“I think that is a good question,” said Matthew Butler, a Moody’s vice president and senior analyst. “I think the gap the state is confronted with has arguably changed in magnitude as a result of the state’s efforts to close it through spending reductions and reserves.”

Moody’s had noted previously the state’s large reserves were a credit strength, Butler said, and using them in this situation is what they are for, but there is still a question regarding what the longer term outlook for the state will be as it comes out of the current situation. And more specifically, how will revenue perform over the next few years, he said.

“Is the state in a position to maintain a balanced budget while potentially replenishing its reserves going forward?” Butler asked. “That is a longer term question that could extend multiple years. That is the big picture situation for California.”

In terms of some of the fixes the state employed to close the budget gap, like promising funding in future years to schools, which have raised questions because of similarities to questionable tactics deployed by the state post-2008 crash like issuing IOUs, Butler said the solutions California has employed are not surprising or that unusual given the situation.

“I would say that what we are seeing right now in terms of crafting a solution using a combination of spending reductions and the use of reserves is not unexpected,” Butler said. “We would expect a similar reaction from most states.”

In its May commentary, authored by Butler, Hetty Chang, an associate managing director, and Timothy Blake, a managing director, Moody’s said: “While not expected, an economic downturn in the next year or two would materially compound the state’s fiscal challenge.”

Though Butler said the governor and lawmakers’ efforts to not only close the deficit this year, but to contemplate budget solutions in a two-year time frame is considered prudent, the state is not out of the woods.

“Assuming the state takes action to close the deficits it currently projects beyond fiscal 2026, it would still operate with slim reserves, making it more vulnerable to a recession,” Butler said. “Rebuilding reserves will necessitate annual operating surpluses, which may be dependent on revenue growth that outpaces the state’s current projections.”